Livestock ERP Software: Connect Animal Management, Farm Operations, Inventory and Finance

Book a Free Demo

This is where Livestock ERP Software becomes important.

A livestock ERP connects animal and farm operations with inventory, procurement, sales, costing and finance so that management can see both what is happening on the farm and what it means financially.

What Is Livestock ERP Software?

Livestock ERP Software combines livestock specific operational management with wider business functions.

A livestock operation may need to manage:

Animals

Breeding

Feed

Health

Weight

Mortality

Farm movement

Inventory

Purchasing

Suppliers

Farm expenses

Sales

Customers

Costing

Accounting

Financial reporting

A standard accounting system may handle purchases, invoices and the general ledger very well.

But it normally does not understand livestock activities such as breeding, gestation, birth, weaning, animal movement, feed consumption and mortality without livestock specific functionality.

A livestock ERP connects these two sides of the business.

Livestock Operations and Finance Should Not Be Separate Worlds

Farm teams think in terms of animals and production.

Finance teams think in terms of inventory, cost and money.

Both are looking at the same business from different angles.

Consider a feed issue.

For the farm manager, it is feed consumed by a group of animals.

For the store, it is inventory leaving a location.

For costing, it is a cost against an animal group or production batch.

For finance, it ultimately affects inventory value and production cost.

If each department records the transaction separately, differences are likely.

A connected Livestock ERP System allows one business activity to provide information to the relevant functions.

Animal Management Remains at the Centre

ERP integration should not turn livestock into ordinary inventory items.

Animals have a lifecycle.

They may be born, purchased, transferred, bred, treated, weighed, grouped, culled or sold.

Breeding animals may continue through several reproductive cycles.

Growing animals may move through different production stages.

The livestock operational layer should therefore maintain the animal lifecycle while the ERP manages the corresponding commercial and financial processes.

Individual Animal and Batch Based ERP

Different livestock operations need different levels of control.

The ERP may need to support:

Individual animals

Animal groups

Production batches

Breeding groups

Locations

Farm stages

This provides flexibility for businesses where some animals need individual tracking while others are managed collectively.

Animal Master and ERP Information

The animal record can contain operational information such as:

Animal ID

Tag or RFID

Breed

Gender

Birth date

Parentage

Farm

Location

Current stage

Weight

Breeding status

Health status

The ERP does not need to force all of this information into the financial chart of accounts.

The livestock application manages the operational detail while the relevant financial transactions flow into the ERP.

Farm Operations Should Drive Inventory Transactions

One of the biggest benefits of livestock ERP integration is connecting physical farm consumption with inventory.

Suppose the farm issues feed to a group of animals.

The operational record can identify:

Farm

Animal group

Feed

Quantity

Date

At the same time, the relevant inventory transaction can reduce feed stock according to the configured process.

Management no longer needs one feed consumption number from the farm and another stock number from the warehouse.

Feed Purchase to Farm Consumption

A connected feed process can follow the complete flow:

Purchase requirement

Purchase order

Supplier

Goods receipt

Quality check where applicable

Farm store inventory

Feed issue

Animal or group consumption

Cost allocation

Financial posting

This creates traceability from the supplier purchase through to actual farm consumption.

Feed Cost Should Reach the Correct Animal or Batch

Feed is normally one of the largest livestock production costs.

Knowing the total feed expense is not enough.

Management needs to understand where that cost was consumed.

The livestock ERP can associate feed consumption with the relevant:

Farm

Location

Animal

Group

Batch

Stage

This provides a stronger basis for livestock costing.

Medicine and Vaccine Inventory Should Work the Same Way

Medicine and vaccines also move through purchasing, inventory and farm consumption.

The process may include:

Purchase

Receipt

Batch or lot

Expiry

Farm transfer

Issue

Animal or group usage

Inventory reduction

Cost

The operational health record and the inventory transaction should remain connected where required.

Expiry Control for Farm Inventory

Certain livestock supplies have limited shelf life.

The system can maintain relevant expiry information for:

Medicine

Vaccines

Other controlled consumables

This helps farm and store teams identify material that should be used or reviewed before expiry.

Procurement Should See What Farms Actually Need

Without integration, procurement may receive purchase requests by email, phone or Excel.

A Livestock ERP can provide better visibility into:

Current stock

Farm requirements

Planned consumption

Open purchase orders

Supplier lead time

Reorder levels

This helps procurement make purchasing decisions using operational information.

Purchase Approval

Livestock businesses may also need control over farm purchases.

Depending on the company policy, purchase requirements can follow an approval process based on:

Farm

Amount

Item

Department

Budget

Management level

This brings farm procurement into the company’s normal purchasing governance.

Supplier Management

The business can maintain supplier information for:

Feed

Feed ingredients

Medicine

Vaccines

Animals

Farm supplies

Veterinary services

Transport

Other services

Management can review supplier transactions and performance within the wider ERP process.

Animal Purchases Need Both Operational and Financial Records

When animals are purchased, two things happen.

The farm receives animals.

The business incurs a financial cost.

The livestock system can create or update the relevant animal records while the ERP manages the purchasing and financial side.

This reduces the need to maintain one animal purchase record for the farm and another unrelated transaction for finance.

Birth Is Different from Purchase

An animal born on the farm has a different business process from an animal purchased from a supplier.

The livestock system needs to understand this distinction.

Birth updates the biological population and animal records.

The costing and accounting treatment should follow the company’s defined accounting policy.

This is an important reason why livestock ERP implementation needs proper process design rather than treating every animal movement like a normal inventory receipt.

Animal Transfers Between Farms

Animals may be transferred from one farm or location to another.

Operationally, the system needs to update:

Source

Destination

Animal or group

Quantity

Date

Current location

From a management perspective, the business may also need to carry the relevant cost and organisational information with the transfer.

The exact financial treatment depends on whether the movement is within the same company or between legal entities.

Mortality Has an Operational and Financial Impact

When an animal dies, the farm population reduces.

But that animal may already carry accumulated cost.

The livestock ERP should therefore maintain the operational mortality record while supporting the company’s defined costing and accounting treatment.

Management can then analyse mortality not only as a percentage but also as a business cost.

Culling and Disposal

Culling may have different commercial outcomes.

An animal may be:

Removed from breeding

Transferred

Sold

Disposed

Processed according to the business model

The livestock ERP should maintain the operational reason and support the appropriate inventory, sales or financial transaction.

Livestock Costing Is Where ERP Integration Becomes Valuable

Farm managers often know production performance.

Finance knows total expenditure.

Management needs the connection between the two.

The livestock ERP can bring together relevant costs such as:

Animal purchase or opening value

Feed

Medicine

Vaccination

Labour

Veterinary services

Utilities

Transport

Farm expenses

Other allocated costs

This allows the business to calculate livestock cost at the level required by management.

Cost Per Animal

For individually managed livestock, the business may need to understand the cost accumulated against an animal.

This can help management evaluate:

Breeding animals

High value animals

Cattle

Long lifecycle livestock

The costing method should follow the company’s accounting and management requirements.

Cost Per Batch

For group based production, batch costing may be more practical.

The batch can accumulate relevant production costs throughout the growing cycle.

Management can then calculate:

Total batch cost

Cost per animal

Cost per kg

Cost by production stage

This gives a clearer picture of production economics.

Stage Wise Costing

Costs may also be analysed by lifecycle stage.

For example, in pig farming:

Breeding

Gestation

Farrowing

Weaning

Growing

Finishing

Management can understand where costs are accumulating rather than seeing only the final cost at sale.

Feed Cost Versus Other Costs

A livestock costing report can separate major cost components.

For example:

Animal cost

Feed cost

Medicine cost

Labour

Veterinary cost

Farm overhead

Other cost

This helps management identify which area is driving changes in cost per animal.

Standard Cost Vs Actual Cost

Some livestock businesses may use planned or standard production costs for management.

The ERP can compare these with actual costs.

Management can review:

Planned feed cost

Actual feed cost

Planned medicine cost

Actual medicine cost

Planned farm expense

Actual farm expense

Total variance

This helps identify where the production cycle moved away from plan.

Mortality Changes Unit Cost

Suppose a batch starts with 1,000 animals.

Costs accumulate throughout the production cycle.

If mortality reduces the final saleable population, the cost per remaining animal may increase.

A connected costing system makes this impact visible.

This is much more useful than reviewing mortality and finance as separate reports.

Weight Based Costing

For livestock sold by weight, management may also want to calculate:

Cost per kg

Average sale weight

Selling price per kg

Margin per kg

This connects animal performance directly with commercial performance.

Farm Expenses Should Reach the Correct Cost Centre

Farm expenses may include:

Electricity

Water

Fuel

Labour

Repairs

Maintenance

Veterinary services

Transport

Consumables

Other overheads

The ERP can record these against appropriate dimensions such as farm, department, location or cost centre according to the company’s accounting structure.

Farm Wise Financial Reporting

A multi farm livestock business should be able to understand the financial performance of each farm.

Management may want to review:

Revenue

Feed cost

Medicine cost

Labour

Farm expenses

Animal cost

Gross margin

Profitability

This connects the farm’s operational KPIs with financial results.

Livestock Sales Should Connect with Animal Records

When animals are sold, the commercial transaction should remain connected with the livestock record.

The process may include:

Customer

Animal or group

Quantity

Weight

Selling price

Delivery

Invoice

Payment

The sold animal should no longer appear as an active animal while its history remains available.

Sales by Actual Weight

Many livestock sales depend on actual weight.

The ERP can maintain the relevant quantity and weight information and use it during sales and invoicing according to the company’s commercial process.

Customer Specific Pricing

Different customers may have different commercial agreements.

Pricing can depend on:

Animal category

Weight

Grade

Quantity

Customer

Contract

Location

The ERP can manage the commercial rules while the livestock system provides the operational animal information.

Customer Credit Management

Before confirming a large livestock sale, the business may need to review:

Customer credit limit

Outstanding balance

Overdue invoices

Payment terms

This is one of the advantages of connecting farm operations with an ERP rather than running sales independently.

Order to Invoice

A connected process can link:

Customer order

Animal selection

Weight

Dispatch

Invoice

Receivable

Payment

Finance does not need to reconstruct the transaction from a farm sales report at month end.

Livestock Inventory and the General Ledger

Operational inventory and financial inventory should reconcile according to the company’s accounting design.

Relevant transactions may include:

Purchases

Receipts

Transfers

Consumption

Adjustments

Sales

The ERP provides the financial control while NAVFarm maintains the livestock specific operational context.

Farm to Finance Integration

The most important concept in Livestock ERP Software is the connection between farm activity and financial information.

A simplified flow may look like:

Farm Activity

Feed or Medicine Consumption

Inventory Transaction

Animal or Batch Cost

Sales or Output

Financial Posting

Management Reporting

The objective is to reduce repeated data entry and give management a consistent view of operations and finance.

Finance Should Not Wait for Month End Farm Reports

In a disconnected environment, finance may receive farm consumption and production information only at the end of the month.

This creates delays in:

Inventory reconciliation

Costing

Financial reporting

Management analysis

When farm activities are integrated with ERP transactions, relevant information becomes available much earlier.

Chart of Accounts Should Not Become an Animal Register

One common ERP design mistake is trying to solve operational reporting by creating too many general ledger accounts.

The chart of accounts should remain financially meaningful.

Operational details such as:

Farm

Animal group

Batch

Stage

Location

Can be handled through the livestock application and appropriate ERP dimensions or analytical structures.

This provides detail without making the financial chart unnecessarily complicated.

Budget Versus Actual Farm Expenses

Finance can prepare budgets for livestock operations.

Actual expenditure can then be compared against:

Farm

Department

Expense type

Period

Production cycle

Management can identify areas where expenditure is moving above plan.

Cash Flow Planning

Future livestock production also creates future cash requirements.

Feed purchases need funding.

Medicine needs funding.

Labour and farm expenses continue throughout the cycle.

A connected ERP gives finance better information for planning working capital and cash requirements.

Multi Company Livestock Operations

Some livestock groups operate several legal entities.

They may have:

Farm company

Feed company

Processing company

Trading company

Separate regional businesses

A suitable ERP structure can support the legal and financial requirements while NAVFarm manages the relevant farm operations.

The final design depends on the organisation structure and transaction flow.

Multi Farm and Multi Location Inventory

Inventory may be stored at:

Central warehouse

Farm store

Feed store

Medicine store

Different farms

Different legal entities

The system should provide visibility into stock at the appropriate location while maintaining the required accounting control.

Management Reporting Should Combine Operational and Financial KPIs

Senior management should not need two completely different reporting packs to understand the business.

A useful livestock ERP dashboard can bring together information such as:

Animal population

Births

Mortality

Feed consumption

Weight

Farm inventory

Production cost

Cost per animal

Sales

Revenue

Margin

Farm profitability

This gives management a more complete view.

Farm Performance Without Cost Can Be Misleading

Two farms may have similar mortality and weight performance.

But one may be using significantly more feed or incurring higher operating costs.

Operational performance should therefore be reviewed together with financial performance.

The best performing farm is not necessarily the one with the highest output.

It may be the one producing the required output at the right cost.

Cost Without Farm Performance Can Also Be Misleading

Finance may identify that one farm has higher expenses.

That does not automatically mean the farm is inefficient.

It may have:

More animals

Different production stage

Higher output

Different feed requirement

Different location cost

The operational context helps finance interpret the numbers correctly.

Livestock ERP Integration with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

NAVFarm can work with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central to connect livestock operations with wider ERP functions.

Depending on the implementation scope, Business Central can support areas such as:

Finance

General ledger

Accounts payable

Accounts receivable

Purchasing

Inventory

Sales

Fixed assets

Banking

Dimensions

Financial reporting

NAVFarm provides the livestock and farm operational layer required to manage animal specific processes.

Together, the solution can connect farm operations with business and financial management.

NAVFarm With an Existing ERP

Not every livestock business wants to replace its current ERP.

A company may already have an established finance, procurement or corporate ERP platform.

In such cases, NAVFarm can be positioned as the livestock operational system while relevant transactions are exchanged with the existing ERP through an agreed integration design.

The exact integration depends on:

Existing ERP

Required transactions

Data ownership

Master data

Posting frequency

Integration technology

Business controls

This gives livestock companies the option to digitise farm operations without automatically replacing every corporate system.

What Information Can Be Integrated With an ERP?

Depending on the project design, integration may include relevant information such as:

Items

Vendors

Customers

Locations

Purchase information

Inventory

Farm consumption

Sales

Costs

Financial dimensions

Other required transactions

The integration should be designed around the customer’s actual process rather than sending every farm record into the ERP.

Master Data Needs Clear Ownership

Integration projects often fail because both systems are allowed to maintain the same master data without clear ownership.

The project should define which system owns information such as:

Item

Vendor

Customer

Farm

Location

Unit of measure

Financial dimension

This reduces duplicate and conflicting records.

Transaction Integration Should Also Be Defined

The implementation team should clearly define which farm activities create ERP transactions.

For example:

Does a feed issue immediately reduce ERP inventory?

Does farm mortality create a financial transaction?

How are animal transfers treated?

When is animal cost updated?

How are farm expenses allocated?

When does a livestock sale create the sales transaction?

These are business design decisions and should be agreed during implementation.

Integration Should Not Mean Duplicate Data Entry

The objective of integration is not to enter the same transaction in NAVFarm and then again in the ERP.

Where integration is implemented, relevant information should move between systems according to the agreed workflow.

This reduces manual effort and improves consistency.

Mobile Farm Data Can Reach the ERP Process

Farm workers may record activities using a mobile device.

For example, a farm user records feed consumption.

That operational activity can become part of the relevant inventory and costing process.

Management receives farm level information while finance receives the business transaction required for accounting.

This is where farm digitisation and ERP integration start delivering real operational value.

Role Based Access

Not every farm employee needs access to financial information.

The solution should allow access according to responsibility.

A farm worker may enter daily activity.

A farm manager may review animal and production performance.

A store user manages inventory.

Procurement manages purchasing.

Finance manages accounting.

Senior management reviews combined operational and financial information.

This keeps the system practical for different users.

Approval Workflows

ERP integration also allows livestock businesses to introduce structured approvals where required.

Examples may include:

Purchase approval

Expense approval

Price approval

Sales discount approval

Inventory adjustment approval

Other financial controls

This brings corporate governance into farm operations without making every daily farm activity dependent on head office approval.

Audit Trail

Management should be able to understand who recorded or changed important transactions.

An audit trail can support investigation of:

Inventory adjustments

Cost changes

Animal movements

Purchase changes

Sales transactions

Other controlled activities

This improves accountability across farm and head office teams.

A Practical Feed to Finance Example

Consider a livestock business purchasing 100 MT of feed.

Procurement creates the purchase order.

The feed is received.

Inventory increases.

Part of the feed is transferred to Farm A.

The farm issues 5 MT to a growing batch.

NAVFarm records the operational consumption against the batch.

The relevant inventory is reduced according to the configured process.

The feed cost becomes part of the batch cost.

Finance receives the corresponding inventory and financial information through the ERP process.

Management can now answer three different questions from connected data:

How much feed is left?

Which animals consumed it?

What did that consumption cost?

A Practical Medicine Example

The company purchases veterinary medicine.

The medicine is received into inventory with the relevant batch and expiry information.

Stock is transferred to the farm.

The veterinarian records treatment against an animal or group.

The operational record shows what treatment was given.

The inventory record shows what quantity was consumed.

The cost can be included in the relevant farm or animal costing process.

One activity now supports health, inventory and financial reporting.

A Practical Livestock Sale Example

A group of animals is ready for sale.

The farm confirms the available population and weight.

The sales team confirms the customer and commercial terms.

The required animals are selected.

The animals are dispatched.

The livestock records are updated.

The ERP processes the sales and invoice transaction.

Customer receivables are updated.

Management can compare sales value with the accumulated production cost.

This creates visibility from farm production through to commercial profitability.

A Practical Multi Farm Example

A livestock company operates four farms.

Each farm records animal movements, feed consumption, mortality and other daily activities.

Head office manages procurement and finance.

Instead of collecting four separate monthly spreadsheets, operational information is available centrally.

Feed inventory is visible by location.

Farm costs can be analysed separately.

Management can compare:

Population

Feed consumption

Mortality

Production cost

Cost per animal

Sales

Profitability

Across all four farms.

Why a Generic ERP Alone May Not Be Enough for Livestock

A standard ERP is designed to manage business transactions.

It may handle:

Purchasing

Inventory

Sales

Finance

Accounting

Very well.

But livestock operations need additional information.

The business needs to understand:

Animal lifecycle

Breeding

Pregnancy

Birth

Weaning

Animal movement

Feed consumption

Weight

Health

Mortality

Production stage

A livestock specific operational layer fills this gap.

Why a Standalone Livestock App May Also Not Be Enough

The opposite problem can occur with a simple livestock application.

It may provide excellent animal records but remain disconnected from:

Inventory

Purchasing

Supplier transactions

Customer sales

Accounts payable

Accounts receivable

General ledger

Financial reporting

Management then has good farm information but still needs manual reconciliation with finance.

Livestock ERP integration connects these two requirements.

What to Look for in Livestock ERP Software

Before selecting Livestock ERP Software, businesses should evaluate both operational and ERP capabilities.

Important livestock capabilities may include:

Animal registration

Individual and batch management

RFID

Breeding

Birth

Weaning

Growth

Weight

Feed

Health

Mortality

Movement

Traceability

Important business capabilities may include:

Inventory

Procurement

Supplier management

Farm expenses

Costing

Sales

Customer management

Credit control

Accounting

Financial reporting

Multiple locations

Multiple companies

Approval workflows

Dashboards

ERP integration

The right solution should connect farm activities with business transactions without making farm users work like accountants.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Livestock ERP Software?

Livestock ERP Software connects animal and farm management with business functions such as inventory, procurement, costing, sales, accounting and financial reporting.

How is Livestock ERP different from Livestock Management Software?

Livestock Management Software primarily focuses on farm and animal operations. Livestock ERP extends that information into broader business areas such as purchasing, inventory, costing, sales and finance.

Can NAVFarm work with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central?

Yes. NAVFarm can work with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central to connect livestock operations with ERP and financial management.

Can NAVFarm integrate with an existing ERP?

Yes. Where required, NAVFarm can exchange relevant information with an existing ERP based on the agreed integration architecture and implementation scope.

Does a livestock ERP manage feed inventory?

Yes. Feed purchasing, inventory, transfers, issues and consumption can be connected with livestock operations according to the company’s process.

Can livestock ERP track cost per animal?

Yes. Relevant costs can be accumulated and analysed at animal, batch, stage or farm level depending on the implemented costing model.

Can farm expenses be connected with finance?

Yes. Farm expenses can be recorded against appropriate farms, locations, departments or other financial dimensions according to the ERP design.

Can livestock ERP manage animal sales?

Yes. Animal or batch sales can be connected with customer, weight, pricing, dispatch, invoicing and financial transactions.

Can livestock ERP manage multiple farms?

Yes. Multiple farms and inventory locations can be managed while providing head office with consolidated operational and financial visibility.

Does every farm user need access to the ERP finance module?

No. Role based access can allow farm users to work with operational functions while finance and management users access the information relevant to their responsibilities.

From Animal Activity to Financial Performance

A livestock business does not operate in two separate worlds.

The farm and finance are part of the same operation.

Feed consumed on the farm has a cost.

Medicine used on an animal has a cost.

Mortality has a cost.

Farm labour has a cost.

Animal movement affects where that cost sits.

And when an animal is finally sold, management needs to know whether the complete production cycle generated the expected return.

This is the real purpose of Livestock ERP Software.

It is not simply about putting accounting and animal records on the same screen.

It is about creating a clear connection between animal management, farm operations, inventory, procurement, costing, sales and finance.

NAVFarm provides the livestock operational layer, while Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central can provide the wider ERP and financial foundation. For organisations already operating another ERP, NAVFarm can also form part of an integrated architecture based on the customer’s existing systems and requirements.

For livestock businesses still reconciling farm registers, inventory sheets, purchase records and finance reports manually, connecting farm operations with ERP can provide a much clearer view of both animal performance and business profitability. To understand how NAVFarm can work with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central or your existing ERP, request a NAVFarm demonstration using your actual livestock lifecycle, farm structure, inventory, costing and financial processes.